THS Creative
Social Media Analysis · Instagram & Facebook Jan 2023–Jun 2026 · LinkedIn Jun 2025–Jun 2026
Overview
Cross-Platform
Instagram
Facebook
LinkedIn
Where Each Platform Stands
Current state · plain language
Instagram
786 followers

Reach has declined every year since 2024 — from an average of 189 per post down to 146 in 2026. The format that reverses this (Reels) averaged 244 reach per post this year and is getting better over time. In 2026, only 1 in 5 posts was a Reel. For the three years before that, it was closer to 1 in 3.

What's happening: The best format is being used least. Reach is following it down.

Facebook
910 followers

Reaches more people per post than Instagram — 277 average vs 177 — and has for two years running. The posts that drive that performance aren't product photography. Six of the top seven Facebook posts from 2024–2026 feature real people: a tribute, team spotlights, milestone moments. Product posts perform below average.

What's happening: People content is outperforming product content. The calendar doesn't reflect that yet.

LinkedIn
One year of data

Different audience than the other two — clients, partners, and potential referral sources who are actively researching THS. Images outperform video here. Named team spotlights are the strongest consistent performer. The Women of Gold series ran in March 2026 and averaged 440 impressions per post — the highest of any content type in the dataset.

What's happening: The best-performing format runs once a year. Everything else averages 294 impressions.

Data Worth Pausing On
The findings most likely to change how the team thinks about content
Instagram · Shares → Reach
More shares = exponentially more reach
0 shares
112
1–2 shares
184
3–5 shares
298
6+ shares
360

Reels average 2.5 shares. Images average 0.8. That gap is why format mix matters — it's not the format itself, it's what the format makes people do.

Engagement → Reach Correlation
Shares 0.45 Likes 0.42 Saves 0.08 ←

Saves have almost no correlation with reach.

Facebook · Share Amplification
6+ shares = 8.6× the reach of no shares
0 shares
153
1–2 shares
221
3–5 shares
451
6+ shares
1,312

Only 4 of 112 Facebook posts hit 6+ shares. Three are people-focused. The chain: people content → shares → exponential reach amplification.

All engagement types correlate strongly
Reactions 0.76 Shares 0.73 Comments 0.71

Unlike Instagram, Facebook rewards every type of engagement roughly equally.

LinkedIn · Two Things to Know
561%
more reach from personal profiles than company page
86%
of LinkedIn "engagement" is just someone clicking to read the post

The 17.7% native ER looks strong. The real social signal — reactions, comments, reposts — is 2.7%. LinkedIn's metric and Instagram's metric are not the same thing.

Team members posting from personal profiles will structurally outperform the company page on the same content. This isn't a content fix — it's an activation question.

Facebook · Posting Frequency Sweet Spot
More posts per month doesn't mean more reach per post
1–2 posts/mo
230 avg reach
3–4 posts/mo
372 avg reach ★
5+ posts/mo
239 avg reach

Posting more than 4 times a month on Facebook reduces per-post reach — posts start competing with each other for the same audience. The algorithm gives each post more visibility when it's not fighting recent posts from the same page.

Facebook · Post Spacing Matters Too
Days since last post vs avg reach
1–3 days
293
4–7 days
219
8–14 days
360 ★
15–30 days
366

Posts spaced 8–14 days apart outperform posts 1–3 days apart. Combined with the 3–4 posts/month sweet spot, the target cadence is roughly one post per week to every 10 days — not more.

Three Things to Change on the Calendar
Specific · backed by data · no new resources required
1
Instagram: Bring Reels back to 1 in 3 posts.

Reels averaged 244 reach in 2026 — the best Reel performance on record — while making up only 18% of posts. The historical rate was 35–38%. Getting back there means roughly every third post should be a Reel. No new equipment, no new strategy. Just the mix.

2
Facebook: At 3–4 posts per month, every post should have a human angle.

The data shows 3–4 posts/month is the sweet spot for per-post reach on Facebook. At that volume, there's no room for filler — every post needs to earn it. People-focused content consistently outperforms product-only posts, so the calendar shouldn't split between people and product. It should ask: how do we make every post feel human? Not necessarily a named spotlight every time, but someone in the frame, a team behind the work, a face connected to the content. A product post becomes "here's what our stylists built this week" instead of "here's a living room set." The angle changes. The reach follows.

3
LinkedIn: One named team spotlight per month.

Named spotlights are LinkedIn's strongest content type — not by a small margin. Women of Gold averaged 440 impressions per post in March 2026. Everything else averaged 269. Running this format once a year in March leaves 11 months of the highest-performing content type on the table. One spotlight a month is achievable and the data backs it.

Cross-platform opportunity: In April 2026, one piece of content reached 444 people on Instagram, 720 on LinkedIn, and 1,470 on Facebook in the same week. Only 9 of 208 Facebook posts in this dataset are flagged as crossposts. Strong content posted on one platform is leaving reach on the table on the other two. The platform tabs have the full data — use the tabs above to go deeper on any platform.

Instagram rewards content people actually respond to. Not content that looks good.

The feed is already 69% personality content. The problem isn't what's being posted — it's the format. Reels are the only format that reaches people outside the existing follower base at scale, and they dropped from 37% of posts to 18% in 2026. The data below shows what that shift cost in reach, and what it would take to reverse it.

How the Instagram Algorithm Works
It's not one algorithm Feed, Reels, Explore, and Stories each use a separate ranking system. A post that performs in Feed doesn't automatically get pushed to Explore. Reels get the broadest organic distribution by default — they're the only format that reaches non-followers at scale.
Top ranking signals Watch time, DM sends (private shares), and likes per reach — confirmed by Instagram's own head, Adam Mosseri. Public shares matter. Saves build future algorithmic momentum rather than immediate reach. Comments help but are a weaker signal than shares.
The invisible signal DM sends are the #1 signal and they don't appear in any export data. When someone sends a post to a friend via Instagram DM, the algorithm treats it as a strong quality signal. This is completely unmeasured in this dataset.
Cadence Consistency matters more than volume. Mosseri's stated recommendation: 2 Reels/week + 3–5 feed posts. THS currently averages 5–6 posts/month total. Posting daily doesn't amplify reach — it dilutes it if engagement per post drops.
Format Performance
2024–2026 · 142 posts
Avg Reach
Reel
219
Carousel
156
Image
156
Avg ER%
Reel
16.7%
Carousel
15.8%
Image
15.3%
Avg Shares
Reel
2.5
Carousel
1.1
Image
0.8

Reels earn 10% of interactions through shares. Carousels and Images earn 5%. Shares put content in front of people who don't follow THS yet.

Personality vs. Business: four years, same result.

This isn't about posting more team photos instead of client work. It's about understanding what triggers engagement on this specific platform.

Polished business content gets seen. People scroll past it because it doesn't invite a reaction. A set showcase doesn't ask anything of the viewer. Personality content does. A photo of three interns, a Halloween costume contest, a team spotlight. These give people something to feel, and that feeling becomes a comment, a save, a share.

Instagram's algorithm treats those behaviors as signals of content quality. More signals equals more distribution. More distribution equals more reach. The entire chain starts with whether the post gives someone a reason to do something other than double-tap and move on.

The feed is already 69% personality content. The data isn't an argument to shift the mix. It's an argument to put more of that personality content into Reel format, because Reels generate 2x the shares of any other format and 40% more reach per post.

One specific example: the Summer Spotlight series in August 2025 — three consecutive posts featuring named team members — averaged 242 reach per post, 34% above the 2025 platform average of 181. Named people content consistently outperforms the platform average on Instagram, not just on Facebook.

ER%: Personality vs. Business by Year
Personality
Business
2024
Personality
22.2%
Business
17.7%
2025
Personality
14.0%
Business
10.9%
2026
Personality
16.6%
Business
13.0%
Format + Content Type Matrix
Personality Reel ★
18.5%
reach 214
Business Reel
12.0%
reach 234
Personality Carousel
16.2%
reach 154
Business Carousel
14.7%
reach 160
Personality Image
14.3%
reach 130
Business Image
16.9%
reach 196

Surprise: Business Images outperform Personality Images on ER%. Brand statements work better as stills than as video.

Top Posts by Reach · 2024–2026
PostFormatReachER%
Material curation reelReel1,0102.5%
Simply Southern shootImage7623.5%
Halloween costumes Pt.2 PCarousel6785.0%
Team personality trend reel PReel6537.2%
David Faircloth tribute PImage52111.3%
Content drives sales BTS PReel44413.3%
Production BTS reel PReel33510.7%
Format Mix by Year · Instagram
How the format split has shifted since 2023

For three straight years — 2023, 2024, 2025 — Reels made up 35–38% of Instagram posts. In 2026 that dropped to 18%. No decision was made to reduce Reels. The mix drifted, Carousels and Images filled the gap, and reach followed the format down.

The compounding effect: each Reel generates an average of 2.5 shares vs 1.1 for Carousels and 0.8 for Images. Shares are how content reaches people outside the existing follower base. Lower Reel volume means fewer shares, which means slower organic audience growth — not dramatically in any single week, but consistently over time.

Reel Mix by Year
Reels
Carousels
Images
2023
Reels
37%
Carousels
38%
Images
25%
2024
Reels
35%
Carousels
46%
Images
20%
2025
Reels
38%
Carousels
34%
Images
28%
2026 (Jan–Jun) ↓
Reels
18%
Carousels
46%
Images
36%
Reel Trends · 2024–2026
Reach per Reel is rising even as the mix drops
Avg Reach per Reel by Year
2024
206
2025
223
2026 ↑
244
Avg Reel Duration by Year (seconds)
2024
23s
2025
26s
2026
38s

Reels are getting longer and reaching more people year over year. The drop in Reel volume in 2026 is not explained by declining Reel performance. The opposite is true.

Reach by Reel Duration · 2024–2026 (47 Reels)
Under 15s
145
15–30s
302
30–60s
228
60s+
330

Note: the 60s+ bucket has only 3 posts. Not enough to draw a firm conclusion. The 15–30s window has the strongest reach signal across a meaningful sample size (13 posts).

Overall Instagram Avg Reach, Year-over-Year
2024
189
2025
181
2026 ↓
146

Overall Instagram reach has declined each year. The 2026 drop coincides with the Reel mix falling to 18%, including zero Reels in February and March. Whether these are causally linked is a question the data raises but doesn't definitively answer.

What Actually Drives Reach · Instagram
Pearson correlation between each metric and reach · 2024–2026 · 142 posts
Engagement Signal → Reach Correlation
1.0 = perfect correlation. 0 = no relationship. Higher = stronger predictor of reach.
Views
0.75
Shares
0.45
Likes
0.42
Comments
0.23
Saves
0.08

Saves have almost no correlation with reach. Despite being widely cited as Instagram's most important signal, saves barely register in this dataset. Shares and likes are the stronger predictors.

Avg Reach by Share Count
Share count is the clearest step function in the data. Each tier roughly doubles the reach ceiling.
0 shares
112 reach
1–2 shares
184 reach
3–5 shares
298 reach
6+ shares
360 reach

Getting to 1–2 shares adds 64% more reach vs no shares. Reels average 2.5 shares per post. Images average 0.8. This is the mechanism behind Reels' reach advantage — not format preference, but share behavior.

What to do Instagram · 3 actions
1
Set a Reel floor of 35% and track it monthly.
At 18%, you're posting Reels about half as often as you were in 2023 and 2025. Target 35%+ (roughly 1 in every 3 posts). This isn't a soft goal; it's the single lever that most directly affects organic reach. Check the mix at the end of each month and adjust the following month's calendar if it's drifting.
2
Make Reels of both types, hitting the 35% floor matters more than the content split.
Business Reels deliver slightly more direct reach (234 vs 214). Personality Reels earn significantly higher ER (18.5% vs 12.0%), which drives algorithmic distribution on future posts. Both outcomes serve reach: one immediately, one compounding. The data doesn't say to favor one over the other. What it says clearly is that the mix needs more Reels, period.
3
Keep Business Images in the rotation. Don't force them into Reels.
Business Images outperform Personality Images on ER% (16.9% vs 14.3%). Brand statements, client showcases, and portfolio posts work better as stills on Instagram. Use them as the static anchor in a Reel-heavy week rather than trying to convert them into video to hit the format quota.

Facebook outperformed Instagram on per-post reach in 2025 and 2026. The best-performing posts were all people-focused.

Facebook reaches 30.4% of its audience per post. Instagram reaches 22.5%. That gap held for two consecutive years — but it didn't exist in 2024, when Instagram led. What opened it was people-focused content: named spotlights, milestones, team moments. Six of the top seven Facebook posts in this dataset are people, not product. The data tables below show exactly where the reach is coming from and what's driving it.

How the Facebook Algorithm Works
How it decides what to show Four-step model: inventory → signals → predictions → relevance score. Over 10,000 individual ranking signals per impression. Up to 50% of your feed is recommended content from accounts you don't follow — this is the discovery surface that Instagram doesn't offer to the same degree for business pages.
Top ranking signals Private sharing via Messenger is the highest-weighted behavior — more than public shares or reactions. Saves and shares outweigh likes. Comments matter. Overposting reduces per-post engagement, which signals to the algorithm that content isn't resonating.
The invisible signal Private DM sharing is #1 and doesn't appear in any export data. Our share correlation data (0.73) captures only public reshares. The true algorithmic signal from sharing is likely stronger than what this dataset measures.
Cadence Industry median is ~5 posts/week. THS data shows 3–4 posts/month as the per-post reach sweet spot — posts spaced 8–14 days apart outperform posts 1–3 days apart. Quality and spacing matter more than volume for a page this size.
FB Avg Reach 2024–2026
277
30.4% reach rate (reach ÷ 910 followers) vs Instagram's 22.5% (reach ÷ 786 followers). The 57% absolute gap partially reflects more followers — the reach rate gap of 8 points shows the platform advantage holds even when audience size is accounted for.
Video Avg Reach
313
vs 268 for Photos (2024–2026). Video also generates more shares: 1.8 avg vs 1.6. Video outperformed Photos in 2024 and 2026, but Photos outperformed Video in 2025, the highest-reach year in the dataset.
Top Post Reach
1,959
Highest single-post reach in the 2024–2026 dataset. A one-time moment, not a repeatable format. It demonstrates the ceiling of what people-focused content can reach on this platform — the repeatable version of that ceiling is the named spotlight format.
Reach Rate by Year · Facebook vs Instagram
Reach ÷ followers — normalizes for audience size (FB: 910, IG: 786)
Year FB Avg Reach FB Reach Rate IG Avg Reach IG Reach Rate Leader
2024 161 17.7% 189 24.0% Instagram
2025 345 37.9% 181 23.0% Facebook
2026 (Jan–Jun) 294 32.3% 146 18.6% Facebook
Overall 277 30.4% 177 22.5% Facebook

Reach rate = avg reach per post ÷ current follower count. Follower counts are current (June 2026) — historical follower counts are not available, so rates are directional, not exact. Instagram: 786 followers. Facebook: 910 followers.

Format & Year Performance · 2024–2026 · 112 posts
Avg Reach by Format (2024–2026)
Video
313
Photo
268
Avg ER% by Format
Photo
16.3%
Video
7.7%

Photos earn more than 2× the engagement rate of Videos on Facebook. Videos reach more people. The two formats optimize for different outcomes on this platform.

Avg Reach by Year
2023
179
2024
161
2025 ↑
345
2026
294

The 2025 spike to 345 avg reach was driven by Q1 people-focused content. Q1 included a one-time tribute post that isn't repeatable, and the Women of Gold series which is. The Women of Gold format averaged 693 reach — 150% above the 2024–2026 average — and ran again in 2026 with similar results (434 avg reach).

Top Posts by Reach · 2024–2026
PostYearFormatReachER%Shares
David Faircloth tribute P2025Photo1,95914.7%6
Content drives sales BTS2026Video1,4707.3%14
THS 40th Anniversary Biz2024Video1,22530.9%7
Women of Gold, Lisa Schultz P2025Photo89222.3%3
Women of Gold, series wrap P2025Photo85533.8%3
Women of Gold spotlight P2025Photo81321.2%2
Women's History Month P2025Photo72016.8%3
What Actually Drives Reach · Facebook
Pearson correlation between each metric and reach · 2024–2026 · 112 posts
Engagement Signal → Reach Correlation
Unlike Instagram, every engagement type correlates strongly with reach on Facebook. The algorithm rewards all forms of response.
Reactions
0.76
Shares
0.73
Comments
0.71
Clicks
0.66

Compare to Instagram: saves have a 0.08 correlation there. On Facebook, the weakest signal (clicks at 0.66) is still stronger than Instagram's strongest non-views signal. Facebook's algorithm is more broadly responsive.

Share Amplification · Avg Reach by Share Count
This is the mechanism behind Facebook's reach advantage. Shares trigger exponential distribution — not linear.
0 shares
153 reach
1–2 shares
221 reach
3–5 shares
451 reach
6+ shares
1,312 reach

Posts with 6+ shares average 8.6× the reach of posts with no shares. People-focused content earns more shares. That's not a coincidence — it's the chain: people content → shares → exponential reach amplification.

What to do Facebook · 3 actions
1
Video reaches more people and generates more shares. But it's not the only path to high reach.
Video averaged 313 reach and 1.8 shares vs Photos at 268 reach and 1.6 shares (2024–2026). The difference is real. But 2025, the highest-reach year in the dataset, was Photo-dominant, driven by specific people-focused content. The data supports video as the stronger format on average, not as a guarantee.
2
People-focused content holds 6 of the top 7 posts in this dataset. That pattern is worth noting.
Named spotlights and milestone content dominate the top of the Facebook dataset. Women of Gold averaged 693 reach in 2025 and 434 in 2026 — both well above the platform average of 277. The 40th Anniversary video reached 1,225. The top of the dataset includes a one-time tribute post that's not a format to replicate — but the spotlight and milestone formats are, and the data supports building them into a regular cadence.
3
Named spotlight format (Women of Gold) averaged 693 reach in 2025 and 434 in 2026 — both well above the platform average of 277.
Four Women of Gold posts in March 2025 averaged 693 reach vs the 2024–2026 platform average of 277 — 150% above average. In 2026, the same series averaged 434 reach, still 57% above the platform average. The format performed above average both times it ran. Named professional spotlights are the most consistently above-average content type in this dataset.

LinkedIn isn't a social platform. It's a research tool.

People who find THS on LinkedIn are evaluating whether THS is worth calling — checking credentials, seeing the work, deciding if there's a point of view worth paying attention to. That changes what "good content" means here. Images and text-heavy posts outperform video (19.3% vs 8.5% native ER). LinkedIn's audience is reading, not watching. The posts that land give them something substantive to engage with.

How the LinkedIn Algorithm Works
360Brew — LinkedIn's ranking AI LinkedIn rebuilt its algorithm around an AI called 360Brew that reads posts for relevance, expertise, and dwell time. It evaluates text semantically, not just engagement counts. High-quality, substantive comments act as major amplifiers. Hashtags no longer carry meaningful weight.
The first 60 minutes matter After posting, LinkedIn shows content to 2–5% of your network as a test. Strong engagement in that window triggers wider distribution. Weak early engagement caps reach. Timing of the post — and having an audience likely to engage quickly — directly affects total reach.
Company page reach dropped 60–66% Between 2024 and 2026, organic reach for company pages fell by 60–66%. Personal profiles now generate 561% more reach than company pages for the same content. THS posts from a company page. The modest organic numbers in this dataset partly reflect a platform-level structural disadvantage, not just content performance.
Cadence 2–3 posts per week is the recommended cadence for company pages. THS averages ~3 posts/month. Consistency matters more than volume here too — sporadic bursts followed by gaps underperform a steady rhythm. Given the company page reach ceiling, posting more without also activating personal profiles may have limited impact.
561%
More reach from personal profiles than company pages
LinkedIn algorithm change · 2024–2026

LinkedIn rebuilt its algorithm to favor people over brands. The reasoning: people trust people more than company accounts, and LinkedIn's engagement data proved it. The result is structural — no amount of content optimization on the company page fully closes the gap.

The THS LinkedIn audience is clients, prospects, and industry contacts — exactly the people you'd want a team member talking to directly. A post from "Alex Tauras, Marketing Specialist at THS Creative" about a client project or a behind-the-scenes insight hits differently than the same post from "THS Creative." It has a face, a point of view, and a network behind it. The person reading it knows who wrote it, what their role is, and can immediately connect it to a real professional relationship.

When a THS team member shares a company post with a single sentence of personal commentary — or posts about a project, a client win, or a behind-the-scenes moment from their own profile — LinkedIn treats it as a personal recommendation and distributes it accordingly. The audience isn't just the team member's direct connections. It extends into their network's network in a way company page posts structurally cannot.

This isn't a content strategy change. It's an activation question: are team members willing to post, and is there a light enough structure to make it easy for them to do it consistently?

LinkedIn's engagement rate measures something different than Instagram's or Facebook's. LinkedIn counts any click on a post, including tapping to expand and read it, as engagement. That click behavior makes up 86% of LinkedIn's reported ER. The actual social signals (reactions, comments, reposts) total 2.7%, not the 17.7% LinkedIn shows natively. The two numbers aren't comparable across platforms. The charts below use both figures and label them clearly.
What LinkedIn Calls "Engagement"
86%
…is clicks. People expanding a post to read it. Reactions + comments + reposts, the actual social signals, make up only 14% of the total.
Sponsored Upside
81K
BTS video: 720 organic impressions → 81,518 when boosted. LinkedIn sponsored is high-leverage when the content is right.
Best Format on LinkedIn
Images
Images average 19.3% native ER vs 8.5% for Video, the opposite of Instagram. LinkedIn rewards substantive text and professional imagery.
Native ER% vs. True Social ER% by Format
Native ER includes all clicks. True Social ER = reactions + comments + reposts only, equivalent to what Instagram and Facebook measure.
Native ER%
True Social ER%
Images / Static
Native
19.3%
True Social
3.1%
Video
Native
8.5%
True Social
1.2%
What to do LinkedIn · 3 actions
1
Build named team spotlights into a regular posting cadence on LinkedIn.
Named professional spotlights averaged 440 impressions and 13.9% native ER, the strongest consistent performers in this dataset on LinkedIn. A real name, a real role, something specific about the person. That's what LinkedIn's audience stops for. This format is worth repeating on a defined schedule. Even once a month is enough to establish a pattern.
2
Use Images as the primary organic format.
Images average 19.3% native ER on LinkedIn vs 8.5% for Video, the opposite of Instagram. The LinkedIn audience is reading, not watching short clips. Professional imagery with substantive copy consistently outperforms video here. Plan the LinkedIn calendar around static posts, not repurposed Reels.
3
Test sponsored content, one campaign showed significant upside.
One BTS video went from 720 organic impressions to 81,518 when sponsored. That's a single data point, not a proven formula, but the gap between LinkedIn's organic ceiling and its sponsored potential is large enough to warrant testing. If budget exists for one sponsored campaign, BTS video is the logical candidate based on what's available in this dataset.

The same post reached 3× more people on Facebook than Instagram.

In April 2026, one piece of content — the "Content That Drives Sales" BTS video — ran on all three platforms in the same week. Instagram: 444 reach. LinkedIn: 720 impressions. Facebook: 1,470 reach. Same content, same week. Each platform did exactly what it was built to do: Facebook amplified shares, LinkedIn drove professional click-throughs, Instagram earned the strongest engagement rate. The gap between platforms isn't a failure — it's an argument for posting strong content on all three.

BTS Video: Same Content, Three Platforms
April 2026
Reach / Impressions
Instagram (Reel)
444
Facebook (Video)
1,470
LinkedIn (organic)
720
ER%, Native Formula per Platform
LinkedIn's 17.2% includes click-throughs. Facebook (7.3%) and Instagram (13.3%) are reactions-based and are directly comparable.
Instagram
13.3%
Facebook
7.3%
LinkedIn (native)
17.2%

Women of Gold: the series that travels.

In March 2026, Women of Gold ran on all three platforms simultaneously — four posts each. Facebook averaged 434 reach per post. LinkedIn averaged 440 impressions. Instagram averaged 171 reach. Facebook and LinkedIn reached roughly the same number of people; Instagram reached less than half.

The caveat: LinkedIn impressions and Facebook/Instagram reach aren't the same metric. LinkedIn can count the same person more than once. But even directionally, the pattern is clear — named people content travels further on Facebook and LinkedIn than on Instagram, and the engagement rate on all three platforms was within 4 points of each other (13.9% / 13.9% / 9.5%).

Women of Gold 2026 · Avg per Post (4 posts per platform)
LinkedIn reports impressions (can count repeat views). Facebook and Instagram report reach (unique viewers). Not a direct comparison — shown together for directional context only.
Avg Reach (FB/IG) · Avg Impressions (LI)
Facebook
434
LinkedIn
440 imp.
Instagram
171
Avg ER%
LinkedIn
13.9%
Instagram
13.9%
Facebook
9.5%
Video Format Drift · Both Platforms
IG Reels % vs FB Video % by year — same shape, different timing

Instagram Reels held at 35–38% for three years before dropping to 18% in 2026. Facebook Video (Reels + Videos combined) dropped earlier — from 36% in 2023 to 21% in 2024 — partially recovered to 27% in 2025, then fell to 19% in 2026.

Both platforms landed at essentially the same number in 2026: 18–19% video content. The paths were different — Facebook dropped first, Instagram dropped later — but the endpoint is the same. That convergence at the same level in the same year points to an organizational output constraint, not a platform-specific algorithm change.

FB "Video" includes both Reels and Videos post types. IG tracks Reels only.

Video Format as % of Total Posts
Instagram Reels
Facebook Video
2023
IG
37%
FB
36%
2024
IG
35%
FB
21%
2025
IG
38%
FB
27%
2026 (Jan–Jun)
IG
18%
FB
19%
Questions this data raises Not conclusions, starting points for discussion
?
Does any of this connect to leads or business outcomes?
This analysis measures how far content travels and how much it resonates. Neither reach nor engagement rate tells us whether social activity influences website traffic, client inquiries, or new business. Without that link, it's hard to know how much weight these numbers should carry in resource and budget decisions, or which platform deserves the most investment. That connection — if it exists — requires lead source data that isn't in this dataset.
?
How much do the Instagram and Facebook audiences actually overlap?
THS has 786 Instagram followers and 910 Facebook followers. The cross-posting opportunity only adds reach if the audiences are meaningfully different people. Platform demographics offer a hypothesis: Facebook tends to skew older (35+) toward professional and community discovery; Instagram skews younger (18–34) and is more algorithmically discovery-driven. For a B2B creative studio, the Facebook audience likely includes more industry contacts and existing clients while Instagram attracts more creatives and younger professionals. But this is a hypothesis, not a measurement. Audience overlap data would materially change the value calculation for cross-posting.
?
The most important signal on all three platforms is invisible in this data. What are we actually missing?
All three platforms weight private sharing — DM sends on Instagram and Facebook, direct shares on LinkedIn — as their highest-value engagement signal. None of it appears in any export data. Our correlation analysis (Facebook shares r=0.73, Instagram shares r=0.45) captures only public reshares. The true algorithmic signal from sharing is likely stronger than what's measurable here. If THS content is being sent person-to-person at any meaningful rate, the platforms are already rewarding it — and this dataset has no way to show it.
?
Should THS team members be posting from personal LinkedIn profiles instead of only the company page?
Company pages lost 60–66% of organic reach on LinkedIn between 2024 and 2026. Personal profiles now generate 561% more reach than company pages for the same content. THS's LinkedIn modest organic numbers (294 avg impressions) partly reflect a platform-level structural disadvantage that no amount of content optimization can fully overcome. Team members posting about THS from personal profiles — sharing company posts, writing about projects, spotlighting clients — would likely reach significantly more people than additional company page posts. This isn't a content question. It's an activation question.